I read somewhere that NOAA had been paying the cost of the observers on the herring boats, but due to cuts to NOAA by the Trump administration, the fishermen started to have to pay half, and the case was filed. Then, the cuts were reversed by the Biden administration, so by the time it got to SCOTUS, the case was moot, but SCOTUS took it…
I read somewhere that NOAA had been paying the cost of the observers on the herring boats, but due to cuts to NOAA by the Trump administration, the fishermen started to have to pay half, and the case was filed. Then, the cuts were reversed by the Biden administration, so by the time it got to SCOTUS, the case was moot, but SCOTUS took it anyway, because reversing Chevron was part of the long-term agenda of the right-wing.
I read somewhere that NOAA had been paying the cost of the observers on the herring boats, but due to cuts to NOAA by the Trump administration, the fishermen started to have to pay half, and the case was filed. Then, the cuts were reversed by the Biden administration, so by the time it got to SCOTUS, the case was moot, but SCOTUS took it anyway, because reversing Chevron was part of the long-term agenda of the right-wing.