JD Vance is a better debater than Tim Walz.
Except when he’s not.
It was almost disconcerting how civil last night’s debate was. Like, “What is this unfamiliar thing I am watching? Surely it’s not… a debate on policies?”
First let me start by saying this: as a longtime government teacher, I have taught many a lesson in which I posed various questions to my students: “Can a president give every American a million dollars?” “Can a president declare war on Canada?” “Can a president force you to convert to their religion?”
Basic functions of government are something any candidate for office should know. It is especially irksome, then, when …