Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kris C.'s avatar

I have heard this theory over the last few decades. I do believe that it we had term limits for our representatives we wouldn’t have people like Pelosi, McConnell, Collins, etc… staying in power for as long as they are. Doing more than just trying to hold on to their job.

Expand full comment
Emily's avatar

"Susan Collins (R-ME), the only Republican Senator up for re-election next year in a state Kamala Harris won, blasted Trump’s Canada tariffs in a floor speech Wednesday, before voting to repeal the national emergency declarations that underpins them."

This is a great example of how money talks in both directions. Senator Collins has had her job since 1997 and still wants to run again in 2026. Until this point, she's been able to make some symbolic gestures toward being moderate that don't really amount to much substantively, and of course Elon Musk would like every Rep and Senator to believe that he can handily fund their defeat at the hands of another GOP challenger when it comes down to it, but now Musk is a liability and tariffs are set to potentially devastate the livelihoods and wallets of Mainers (especially in the much poorer and more rural northern part of the state where she is from and which normally hands her the reelection. Harris might have won the state overall, but Trump won northern Maine). If the public perception switches toward her *not* caring if her neighbors and constituents are hungry and freezing next winter, she's going to lose in 2026. Any GOP challenger wanting campaign support from the GOP donors would have to run on loyalty to a president who is impoverishing our state, and that's not going to be a winning proposition either. So the options are that Susan Collins stands up to Trump/Musk and maybe defends her job, or the seat simply switches over to an Independent or Democrat. It'd be incredible if this is the thing that finally breaks her 30-year winning streak.

Expand full comment
43 more comments...