Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Timothy Patrick's avatar

Before I go off on a tangent let me first say thank you Amanda for this essay, it was really soothing to get this framed in a clarifying way. Everything you said makes a lot of sense.

Here’s where my mind went: the evil part of linking employment with affordable healthcare is that it traps people into harmful non-decisions in their career. So many people would love to make a choice but feel like their family’s health depends on them to stay put. We tend to think of companies as being “generous” to provide benefits to their employees, but there really isn’t such a thing as “generous” or “greedy” corporations. They all do the absolute minimum so that their shareholders are happy. It’s structural to how corporations are defined: to not be “greedy” would get the executives fired. These “benefits” are cudgels to keep us from a competitive market of being fulfilled in our careers. The “benefits” are often things that should be guaranteed as basic human rights: health, a secure retirement, earning a living over the cost of survival. “Benefits” (if they exist at all) should be icing on top of that, not survival basics.

That’s something to think about when you hear someone use the phrase “Medicare for all” in their election campaigns. They are also talking about giving you the freedom to choose a job that’s right for you, instead of extorting you into a trap, with your family’s health as their leverage.

Once you can pursue a career of your choice, maybe then you can also pursue our country’s founding ideals: life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. 😌

Deborah - NC's avatar

Ouch - this one hits. "What’s the payoff of not deciding? You might be avoiding responsibility, the unknown, grief, judgment of others, failure, or even success."

2 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?