Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Missy's avatar

This is Elise's most hard-hitting article yet, and I appreciate that: no mincing words! But I'm so so so angry that this is happening.

I know I'll likely be disappointed, but I want to go back to all those Trump voters Sharon surveyed last month and ask if they still support him. But I fear that the sunk cost and propaganda is too powerful. Meanwhile, other than a few gems like Van Hollen, our electeds only care about lining their own pockets (see yesterday's article on insider trading).

We can't wait for them: WE save us, together. Keep attending the Hands Off and Tesla Takedown protests. Care for your neighbors. Keep calling your reps. We can do this.

Expand full comment
Timothy Patrick's avatar

When I walked out of the theater earlier this year after watching "I'm Still Here," I was reflecting with my friends how the film reframed my understanding of modern authoritarianism. The Brazil depicted wasn't a constant display of military parades, but rather a society where repression operated behind a carefully maintained façade of normalcy. Families still enjoyed ice cream outings and beach parties while their neighbors quietly disappeared. The genius of this system wasn't that it eliminated freedom entirely, but that it made the sacrifice of others' freedom feel distant and abstract to those not directly affected.

What's particularly alarming about the Trump-Bukele partnership is how it normalizes extrajudicial punishment through economic incentives, creating a template for authoritarianism that feels distinctly American. By outsourcing incarceration to another country, the administration creates a jurisdictional limbo where legal protections become irrelevant, reminiscent of earlier experiments with Guantanamo Bay. The $15 million payment transforms human rights abuses into simple business transactions, while the theatrical public humiliation of detainees serves as powerful propaganda. Most concerning is how easily Americans might accept this arrangement – not because they embrace authoritarianism outright, but because it comes wrapped in familiar packaging: pragmatism, efficiency, and the promise of safety (a safety that seems threatened even despite the low numbers in the statistics provided by Elise).

El Salvador's citizens praise Bukele for allowing them to finally enjoy concerts and public spaces without gang violence, but this newfound "freedom" masks the wholesale abandonment of due process for everyone, not just the tens of thousands behind bars. Let’s not dismiss the horrible situation that pre-Bukele Salvadorans were faced with. It’s not like being afraid of stepping outside your front door is an example of freedom. But the popular solutions they received to solve the problem are ultimately just sweeping the issue under the rug in an unsustainable way.

Authoritarianism has already arrived in America, via outsourcing – it didn’t arrive with tanks in the streets or dramatic martial law declarations. Instead, it came draped in the American flag, to be celebrated at football games, to be justified from pulpits, and to be validated by academic institutions that have been extorted into compliance. The Venezuela-to-El Salvador deportation scheme offers a perfect case study: it bypasses legal hurdles, creates jurisdictional black holes beyond constitutional reach, and packages human rights abuses as pragmatic solutions to complex (exaggerated) problems. These gangs do exist and are dangerous, but I would have hoped that I wouldn’t be asked to suspend my essential legal rights for fear of something that isn’t likely to affect almost anyone’s ability to live their life.

Today it's Venezuelan gang suspects identified by questionable criteria like tattoos; tomorrow it could be domestic protesters or political opponents, or suspects based on who they follow on Substack, all processed through systems designed to operate beyond the reach of constitutional protections or public scrutiny.

What makes this approach so insidious is its plausible deniability. Citizens can still enjoy their daily lives and maintain the comforting fiction that they live in a free society, even as the foundations of that freedom are systematically dismantled for those deemed problematic. The Trump-Bukele model doesn't require widespread repression – just targeted action against marginalized groups that the majority can be convinced to fear or ignore, all while the machinery of entertainment and consumption continues uninterrupted. This is authoritarianism custom-built for American sensibilities: outsourced, profitable, entertaining, and wrapped in the language of practical problem-solving rather than ideological revolution.

Expand full comment
95 more comments...

No posts